The Best Route to Navigate New York

The Best Route to Navigate New York
July 28, 2008

One of the most important economic resources of New York State is the transport truck. Few New Yorkers are aware of the fact that trucks transport nearly 90 percent of manufactured freight in the state. Approximately 91 percent of communities throughout the state rely exclusively on delivery of goods by truck. Thus, the economic solvency of this industry should be of vital concern to state residents. Moreover, the state government should be concerned with the well-being of the trucking industry. However, all is not in a state of domestic bliss in New York.

On May 12, NY Governor David Paterson announced his intention of instituting a new policy on statewide large-truck movement. The new regulations would, in essence, force trucks to travel only on the state highway system.

In an attempt to reduce fuel consumption and transport costs, many trucks opt to travel across the state via local roads. The routes are shorter, the roads are toll-free, and cheaper fuel can be found off the main roadways.

According to facts and figures released by the New York State Department of Transportation, the excess travel by trucks on secondary or local roads is posing a hazard to the environment, and is disrupting local welfare through increased noise and increased traffic. Furthermore, the smaller local roads were not designed and engineered for large scale, heavy traffic. The roads are narrower, shoulders are narrow or non-existent, and many roads are home to local pedestrians. Also, many local roads have a much lower standard of maintenance than the main roads. As such, the state intends to re-direct large-truck traffic to the regulated interstate highways.

The impact of this proposed regulation is quite apparent. Supporters of re-routing state the inherent environmental and safety benefits of re-directing truck traffic. Opponents, primarily the trucking industry, warn that traveling solely on interstate highways will drastically increase operating costs. (Other opponents of the proposed change include local businesses – fuel stations, restaurants, service garages, motels - that have benefited economically from the increased commercial traffic in recent years). The interstate routes are longer, thus increasing overall fuel consumption. Fuel at roadside truck-stops is generally more expensive, and the highway tolls and taxes for freight trucks are quite high. Ultimately, the additional expenses will be passed on to the consumers in the form of higher prices.

Lobbying efforts by the New York State Motor Truck Association (NYSMTA), a non-profit trade association representing more than 800 trucking companies, are continuing in an attempt to dissuade the state from enacting these new regulations.

---

Changing With The Times

Changing With the Times
July 28, 2008

"Necessity is the mother of invention," wrote the Greek philosopher, Plato. Long before our "modern" world was even a glimmer of a thought in someone's imagination, Plato coined this phrase that still has much meaning. Centuries later, another writer, Mark Twain, penned a variation of Plato's words, when he wrote, "Necessity is the mother of taking chances." In retrospect, both Plato and Mark Twain seemed to envision the 21st century.

The global fuel situation has affected virtually every one of us in one way or another. For those whose livelihood depends directly on fuel, the impact has been ever more severe. The trucking industry in America is a prime of example of both making changes and taking chances.

Clyde M. Fuller (1926 – 2002) will long be remembered as a prolific entrepreneur and innovator in the trucking industry. In the 1970's, Mr. Fuller revolutionized long haul trucking through the introduction of cross-country driving teams, enabling freight to cross the country in 48 hours. Employing their father's long haul techniques, Fuller's sons built their own fortunes and competing companies, U.S. Xpress and Covenant Transport, both based in Chattanooga, Tennessee. While both companies contributed greatly to establishing their hometown as one of the leading trucking hubs in the U.S., events of recent years have forced the owners to re-examine their father's business strategy.

U.S. Xpress is one of several long-haul companies that are seriously examining their target market. They believe that the future of cross country drives is limited. They have begun to cut the drivers' length of haul, and are greatly increasing their regional fleets for shorter routes. Additionally, U.S. Xpress has shifted a large percentage of its long haul business to shipping via railroads. Some trucking executives believe that railroads will eventually come to own the long-haul marketplace.

Other companies, like Covenant, are not rushing to abandon a market that has proven to be quite lucrative. They hope that better control of expenses will enable the companies to remain competitive and profitable. Covenant has introduced new policies that cut down on truck idling time, reduced empty miles, decreased its number of long distance teams, and limited the traveling speed of trucks to 65 m.p.h. for better fuel efficiency. Covenant has also concentrated some of its business in regional trucking. Rather than abandon the long haul routes, they have added short haul routes through a regional company that they recently purchased.

The question, of course, is which of Clyde Fuller's legacy is correct? The answer is still unclear. Only time will tell if it is possible to retain and modify the past, or if change will be the way of the future.

Fuel for the Truck; Fuel for the Trucker

---

Fuel for the Truck; Fuel for the Trucker
July 20, 2008

Ever heard of Breezewood, Pennsylvania? If you're a trucker traveling through the state, you're probably familiar with this quarter-mile strip located at the junction of I-70 and the Pennsylvania Turnpike – places to eat and places to re-fuel. But, there's more than meets the eye in Breezewood. Nestled between the rigs is one tractor trailer that doesn't seem to move much. It is the mobile chapel of Rev. Shannon Rust. Truckers can re-fuel their rigs and also re-fuel their souls.

According to the Trucker's Friend National Truck Stop Directory, an industry publication, there are more than 230 chapels located at truck stops across the nation. This number has almost doubled in less than a decade.

Long hours on the road, alone with one's thoughts, can leave a person anxious and searching for answers to the milieu of problems that have become all too common today in a troubled industry. While truckers employed by major companies still enjoy a relative degree of job stability, the independent truckers are going through rough times. Meeting expenses is the task at hand. Many truckers are spending longer tours away from home in order to make ends meet. However, the price of these trips is steep emotionally as well as financially. Problems at home have to be addressed long distance. The worry of bills in arrears always looms. The question of the next job is continually on the horizon.

Seeking peace of mind has become an intrinsic part of traveling the road. Helping the truckers deal with loneliness and worry is the task of these mobile preachers. The number of truckers visiting these truck-stop chapels is growing. Truckers are making time for prayer as well as food and maintenance. Preachers like Mr. Rust are serving an important role in keeping America moving.

Next time you're traveling the Interstate and your personal fuel gauge is starting to run low, keep your eyes open for one of America's soul re-fueling stations. The service is friendly and efficient, and you can always afford to fill your tank.

Railroad Superiority?

---

Railroad Superiority?
July 20, 2008

In the age of rising fuel prices, there is much scrutiny of the nation's transportation system. As the saying goes, desperate times call for desperate measures.

Although many Americans feel that they are hostage to foreign powers that control the flow of crude oil, they are yet to widely endorse alternatives. One school of thought promotes alternate fuel sources. Other opinions support re-examination of the ways America moves people and goods. In either case, as America's dependence on foreign produced items continues to grow, transporting these goods is major business.

A prime example is the transport of container goods. Short haul transport is best managed by truck. However, as distances grow, and America is by no means a small country, so do the options. When time is the primary concern, air freight is the preferred mode of transport. However, air transport is far too prohibitive, both in terms of cost and capacity, for large loads. The choice is either truck or railroad.

The US interstate highway system is quite extensive and is home to thousands of transport vehicles, as well as private. However, the number of trucks is continually growing, requiring expansion of the roadways due to sheer capacity and the necessary maintenance. Construction of additional lanes, to accommodate the increased volume, will cost taxpayers billions of dollars. As transportation bonds are but one of a plethora of proposed legislations that are presented to the voting public, choices have to be made and questions are raised. Could alternate modes of cargo transport serve the needs of the American consumer? Does an increase in road traffic have negative environmental effects? Are other resources being under utilized?

Proponents of railroad transport have the answers to these questions. They feel that America lags far behind European nations in terms of railroad usage. While it is true that the distances are far greater between points in the US, it still does not negate the fact that railroad lines are dedicated modes of travel, virtually undisturbed by other vehicles. Supporters state that rail transport is far more efficient than trucks and certainly would save taxpayers money. Industry analysts claim that increased train usage could greatly reduce the number of trucks on the nation's roadways, thus reducing fuel consumption and contributing to a healthier environment. Similarly, the costs associated with increased rail usage are far less than the costs necessary for upkeep and expansion of the roadways.

What is clear is the need for increased joint studies by legislators and industrial leaders to define where America is going and how it is going to get there.